Mourning and memorial culture on the
Internet :The Israeli case
Abstract
The
aim of this article is to demonstrate the relationships between the Internet
and the Israeli culture of mourning and memorialization. The study examines the
question as to whether the Internet renews the culture of mourning and
memorialization, and what are the characteristic traits of expression of very
painful and difficult emotions of bereavement over the Internet in the Israeli
context. The study is primarily based on an ethnographic study taking place
through and on the Internet, examining the Israeli sites and the virtual
support communities for the mourning and bereaved. We will present the
reciprocal relations and the links that exist between the culture of mourning
and memorialization over the Internet and between wider processes taking place
on the level of Israeli society.
Key Words:
Ethnography,
Internet, Methodology, Virtual ,Qualitative, Memorial sites , Israeli society.
Author's Note:
The
author wishes to thank to the Hubert Burda Center for Innovative Communications
and the Bereavement Fund at the
Bob Shapell School of Social Work of the University of Tel Aviv, in cooperation
with the Israeli Ministry of Defense,
for funding this research.
Shiri was a very special person. Gifted with beauty, joy,
talent and goodness of the heart. Shiri was a proud Jewish Israeli
young woman. She was murdered on Tuesday, June 18th 2002 by a Palestinian
suicide bomber on her way to work. We will never forget her.
]http://www.shiri.us/eng-main.html]
The
above excerpt is from the opening page of Shiri virtual memorial site. It
is not alone; there are many such memorials on Israeli Internet sites. Along
with the sites, there is an active Israeli support communities for the bereaved
and those in mourning. One of the
sites administrator’s greetings details the community’s goals:
People often want to share, release feelings, let it all out, tell
stories, be comforted, embrace and be embraced in return. This is the place.
You already know me, I am one of you, member of the huge clan of all those who
have lost someone near and dear to our hearts…I am here for you exactly as you
are here for me, to listen, to respond, and often just to be silent. [http://www.tapuz.co.il/tapuzforum/main/anashim.asp?forum=105&pass=1]
The
aim of the present article is an examination of the following questions: Has
the Internet rejuvenated the culture of mourning and memorialization, and if
so, to what degree? Is it expanding the sphere of mourning, reorganizing the
field, or changing it from the bottom up while restructuring new patterns? What
characterizes the way in which painful and difficult emotions of loss are
expressed on the Internet, which is a system constructed on impersonal
communication without physical visual interaction? How does the Internet
contribute to the Israeli culture of loss and memorialization, especially given
the processes of change, leading to increased sectorialization and
privatization of the past few years.
Since
the Internet is a new medium, with many implications for Israeli society that I
will examine in my article, I feel it is best to begin with a brief description
of he Internet and its affects on society:
In
contrast to other media, the Internet integrates personal and mass media. It
has, in fact, created a new mode of human communication, enabling participants
to take part in two-way communication. Users of the World Wide Web are no
longer passive audiences of data consumers as in media such as television and
radio, but are active participants controlling the contents of the desired
information. They shape the quality of the data and respond to them.
The
Internet opens up a simple virtual topography of sites and “addresses” to
users, allowing travel from site to site by moving from link to link.
Cyberspace, or cybernetic space, through which users move, does not imitate the
real world, but rather creates a rapid, new, immediate, multi-layered world,
thanks to the 24/7 accessibility to the Internet and site structure (Nunes, 1997).Vast amounts of data and links
to additional, related sites provides a huge storehouse of available
information; thus, the Internet is a technological innovation tightly linked to
social change. These social changes have clear implications for the patterns of
mourning and memory to be detailed in the research and described below.
In
order to distinguish the characteristics of expression of painful emotions of
grief and loss on the Internet, we shall discussion about emotions in the net. On-line
communication on the Internet facilitates the expression of emotions (output)
and the input of emotional messages, thus developing and reinforcing important
social ties between users, forming a system of relationships similar to ties of
family and friendship, all taking place without participants being physically
present. Thus, the Internet may be said to aid in preserving personal and
intimate ties in cases where face-to-face contact is impossible due to physical
distance between parties. On-line interaction through the Internet functions
mostly as a writing medium, operating within a communications framework that
takes place in “real time,” i.e., the Internet transforms the act of writing
into “speech”.
On
one hand, communication through the Internet provides immediacy, accessibility
and continuousness to the expression of emotion; on the other hand, it differs
from face to face communication. When both parties are present, physical and
visual interaction provides details on the identity of users and about the
situation eliciting the emotion. This phenomenon questions the essence of
emotions, the degree to which they are concrete, and their mode of expression
in virtual space. Can emotions really be expressed through an “impersonal” or
“alienated” computer technology? Can we express emotions of love, pain or
sorrow through a communication medium based on reading and writing, but lacking
any visual physical expressions?
The
social space from which we can learn about the expression of emotions through
the Internet is formed by virtual communities, such as e-groups. Studies that
have investigated interpersonal communications in these communities, primarily
studying virtual support groups, have found that on-line communication enables
users to freely express emotions and reach a high level of self-disclosure.
This exposure is accomplished through expressive codes developed among users as
a sign language and vocabulary of abbreviations, and through written
descriptive emotions (in short or
expanded form) in “real time” in a genuine, spontaneous manner (Weinberg, Schmale, Uken and Wessel, 1996;
Salem, Bogar and Reid, 1997). As a new
medium, the Internet facilitates the expression of emotions through on-site
memorialization through participation in grief works support groups. A closer
examination of these phenomena brings us to focus on the next issue:
Communities
define their identity in the present through the design and restructuring of
the collective memory that they have in common. This factor forms the group and
unifies the community, but can also become the battleground between various
agents of memory as to which memories should be conserved and which forgotten.
Communities fix and conserve their collective memory through different
practices, such as museums, contracts, cemeteries, special memorial days,
history books and more. Nora (1989) has
defined these manifestations of collective memory as “places of memory” (Lieux
de Memoire): He does not relate to the limited definition of the word in
space, but emphasizes its broadest interpretation. He characterizes these
“places of memory” as the visual expression on the public sphere, as events
found on the real-time calendar, and as mental spaces existing within the consciousness
of people who remember, expressed in dialogue, dress and behavior.
The virtual memorial wall for American
soldiers who died in Vietnam
The
Internet technology influences the memorial culture since it transforms the
concepts “place of memory” and “community of memory,” placing them in a space
cut off from specific time and place, with direct and unmediated access 24
hours a day. In addition, it expands the virtual memorial sites into meta-places
of memory. Each site can simultaneously use several practical memorial methods,
and exhibit several places of memory at one time: photo gallery, monument,
poem, condolence book and linking users to other memory sites.
All
this is made possible thanks to the multi-layered presentation and hypertext
resources of virtual sites.
Internet
technology can transform the virtual social space into a place where those who
are grieving can receive group support, participate in discussions and chats,
and memorialize the departed in virtual memorial sites on differing levels of
the personal, communal, national and global. Memorial sites may include many
elements of traditional mourning ceremonies, such as biographical details of
the departed, dates of birth and death and selected photographs. There may also
be formal or religious items enabling mourners and visitors to participate in a
wide range of meaningful activities or ceremonies, such as building a monument,
lighting a virtual memorial candle, and writing in the memorial book of
condolences.
United States Holocaust Memorial Museum,
Washington, D.C.,
Sofka (1997) described several goals for
memorial sites; the sites can bring together a memorial community of support
from among the mourners, and primarily from among others who are dealing with
daily mourning. With the help of the site, those experiencing loss can receive
affirmation of their emotions during difficult times. Visiting memorial sites
assists the mourners in overcoming their feeling of isolation and loneliness,
and helps them identify with other bereaved. Such sites allow the users to
express their condolences to public figures and to private citizens, while
allowing the bereaved to receive support from a wide sector of people through
the virtual “condolence book” or through a link to e-mail.
The
site can host discussions on emotions and conflicts that arose following the
death. Development of memorial sites can help fulfill the obligations and needs
of the mourners, primarily in cases in which the body was not found, or for
people who were buried at a place very distant from those mourning the departed
(Andsager, 1997; Sofka, 1997).
Examples
of centralized Internet memorial sites are the virtual patchwork quilts of AIDS
victims, [http://www.aidsquilt.org/] the virtual memorial wall for American soldiers who died in
Vietnam,[http://www.thevirtualwall.org]
and the United States Holocaust Memorial Museum, Washington, D.C., [http://www.ushmm.org/],
(Andsager, 1997). Virtual memorial
sites and the grief support community exist in Israeli society. The rise in the
number of these sites is linked to processes of change taking place in Israeli
society over the past two decades, as I shall proceed to describe:
Israeli
society has shaped its civilian social culture in accordance with the Zionist
narrative through the “founding myth” that described the establishment of the
State of Israel as part of the continuum of Jewish historical heritage (Zerubavel,
1995). The founding myth was
structured and maintained, among others, by state-established to remember
Independence Day and memorial all of the fallen who contributed to the
struggle. Independence Day was made part of the fabric of the Jewish religious
holidays, such as Passover and Hannukah, symbolizing the heroism of the Jewish
people. Alongside of Independence Day ritual, there developed within Israeli
society a culture of mourning for the fallen Israel’s wars, expressed in the
concept “the family of bereavement” (Witztum
and Malkinson, 1993).
In contrast to the ritual of
Independence Day and the ritual of memorial Israel’s fallen soldiers, the
Israeli society found it difficult to cope
with the trauma of the Holocaust. The Israelis succeeded in doing so only by
embracing it within the Zionist ethos through heightening the link between the
Holocaust of the Jewish people and their rebirth as the State of Israel.
The
chipping away at the status of the hegemony of Zionist memory over the past 25
years within Israeli society has led to the privatization of collective memory
and changes in the culture of memorial. The first example of this process may
be seen in the transition in the memorial processes for the Holocaust and for
the fallen in Israel’s wars. The emphasis is passing from collective national
memorial to memorials that express a more personal meaning of bereavement, plus
the integration of personal and communal mourning in official government
memorial sites (Wiesel and Shamir,
2000).
Another
example of this trend may be observed in the struggles by bereaved families
against the Israel Defense Forces and government agencies as they press for
full disclosure of circumstances surrounding the death of their fallen son or
daughter. Yet another example is seen in families’ appeals for personal grave
inscriptions in military cemeteries, instead of the standard IDF formula (Naveh, 1998).
The
second type of sectorialization processes which memorial culture is undergoing
in Israel, including the increase in the number of agents of memory, is
observed in the many memorial activities celebrating the memory of the prime
minister, the late Yitzhak
Rabin. The many memorial activities for Rabin that were intended to unify
Israelis actually express precisely these deep rifts in Israeli society (Feigeh, 2000).
This
picture is a part from a virtual exhibition “Tears of Shock” in
memory of Yitzhak Rabin. The 33 photographs in this exhibition were taken
during the week after the murder, in Rabin's square in Tel Aviv, by Tal Gluck.
(All
rights reserved to Snunit Educational Information
System, the Hebrew University of
Jerusalem. Photography by Tal Gluck, All
rights Reserved)
Changes
in the culture of commemoration and memorialization in Israel are linked to the
rise of virtual Israeli sites on the Internet that the writer examined in
studies. Two surveys using the Net’s search engines showed that currently there
are hundreds of such sites, and they are constantly increasing. Based on an
initial survey, memorial sites can be classified into two major categories:
government sites and private and community sites.
The site in memory of Israel’s fallen soldiers
Government
sites are more overall and general, providing less personal expression of
bereavement. For example, the site in memory of Israel’s fallen soldiers,[http://www.izkor.gov.il], presents a set
format: a single portrait of the soldier, birth and death dates, short
biography from the Ministry of Defense Yizkor [memorial] Book, and
gravesite. In contrast, private and community sites are much more detailed, and
provide much greater freedom to their initiators. They contain combinations of
several shrine practices simultaneously: opening photograph, detailed
curriculum vitae, eulogies and condolences, letters, poems, visitors’ book and
contact link for the family and those who set up the site, such as Racheli’s
site [http://www.racheli.org/].
Other, more complex sites, include audio-video clips, background music, photo
gallery and added extras such as referral to an existing monument set up by a
bereaved father.
“Webshrines”
are a virtual space in which commemoration, bereavement and private and public mourning
meet and maintain a dialogue with events in the real world. Sites therefore
supply complex and varied materials for ethnographic research, although
studying these data only through virtual fieldwork produces one-dimensional and
simplistic findings.
In
order to fully study the entire complexity of the fieldwork, the researcher
integrated three methodologies of qualitative data-gathering that complement
each other: offline and online, online observations, interviews and documentary
analysis as well as analysis of articles from the press and Internet databases.
In
the initial stage of the fieldwork the researcher chose to gather data through
the online observation in order to take full advantage of the relative
advantages of Internet research: the expanded field of research, which covers
more ground geographically and has higher accessibility to subjects than
traditional fieldwork.
As
part of the observations, the researcher visited official government virtual
memorial sites, private sites and memorial services, and performed content
analysis on their components. Along with these analyses, the researcher
followed-up the support communities involved with bereavement and loss,
focusing on various issues such as the “Second Generation” of the Holocaust and
victims of Arab terrorist attacks, documenting the processes and activities
that took place in these sites over a one year period.
At
the same time as performing observations, the researcher carried out content analysis
on documents and various articles on the issue from the press and databases on
the Internet, such as virtual newspapers as “Captain Internet” and “TheNet.”
Using these two methods enabled the writer to collect factual data from the
field, i.e., from the sites themselves: the quantity of sites and communities,
classifications, structure, contents and components.
At
a more advanced stage of the research, the writer made the connection between
the virtual field and the real field through a transition from online
data-gathering methods to offline data collection methodology structured on
thirty interviews with research subjects. Based on the observations and content
analysis, the writer took a random representative sampling of layers among the
research population including those who initiated virtual Israeli memorial
sites and those who built them, on various levels (personal, group, national);
directors of private and other sites supplying memorial services; and
facilitators/directors of virtual support communities dealing with loss and
bereavement.
Interviewees
were approached through an e-mail notification including a short description of
the research and the request to take part, as well as phone numbers. The
e-mails of interviewees were located through on-site links to “Contact Us,”
“Write Us,” “Reactions,” “Visitors/Guest Book” or “Forum Manager” on various
sites. 70% of those contacted gave their consent by telephone or e-mail to the
interview request.
Interviews
were semi-structured, seeking the personal viewpoint and world-view of the
interviewee, while, at the same time, posing specific questions that limited
and bounded the range of answers.
The interviews provided the writer with a means to attain information
about a particular person and the wider social-cultural context in which the
interviewees live. In the interview setting, subjects acted both as respondents
who described their personal experiences, outlooks and place centering around
the virtual shrine or support community and as informants, when they examined
and described in general the processes and phenomena associated with
memorialization on the Internet.
Use of three
complementary methodologies of data-gathering, online and offline, enabled the
researcher to collect comprehensive information from various realms about the
sites: who is behind them; why did they choose this method; what characterizes
them as compared to other means of memorialization; what characterizes the
subjects of the memorial sites (individuals and communities); and what is their
association with existing memorial sites.
The
study of the sites that are involved in painful emotions of loss and
bereavement provided this researcher with an outlook on the expression of
emotions on the Internet. The writer studies issues such as how emotional
messages can be transmitted, despite limitations of lack of physical and visual
interaction; what are the characteristics of expression of emotions on the
Internet; and why people select this medium for transmitting their deepest
feelings.
Before
turning to the discussion of the findings, it must be noted that this
researcher is currently involved in the early stages of processing of the field
data, and therefore, the following data are initial findings only, without
representing the overall complexity of the research field.
During
the fieldwork, we noted that the number of memorial sites on the Israeli
Internet has risen constantly and consistently. It seems that this trend is
associated with the rise in the number of deaths of young people in military
action, terror attacks and fatal road accidents, as well as rising public
awareness of use of Internet technology. Currently, sites are created and
updated within days, sometimes even hours, of the time of death, in contrast to
the past, when it may have taken several years.
Changes
in the culture of mourning and memorialization in Israeli society are reflected
in official governmental memorial sites, such as the public discussions of the
design of the site in memory of Israel’s late prime minister Yitzhak Rabin.
Arguments are expressed between those who wish to forget that his death was the
result of a political assassination, as opposed to those who refuse to do so.
An additional example of this phenomenon is the personalization of national
memorial Internet sites, such as the Yizkor
site for fallen soldiers. Formerly run by ironclad rules for respectful and
uniform length of each entry, it has now ceased to limit the curriculum vitae
of the fallen soldiers, and has even recently approved links to the personal
memorial site for the particular soldier at the end of his “page”.
Simultaneously
with these processes, we have also seen a rise in public awareness in Israel of
the existence of these sites. This shows up in the dramatic number of hits on
such sites, mainly around national solemn days such as the Day of Remembrance
for Israel’s Fallen, or when there are terrorist attacks or military actions
with a very heavy price in human life. This intense activity often results in
the collapse of sites that were unprepared for such “heavy traffic” and require
site managers on the state sites to beef up the sites around these dates.
The Holocaust Heroes’ and Martyrs’
Remembrance Authority, Jerusalem
An
additional process is the way the official state sites function as alternatives
for the traditional national sites of former times: the Internet site for Yad Vashem, the Holocaust Heroes’ and
Martyrs’ Remembrance Authority, Jerusalem, has become a pilgrimage site for
those wishing to remember individuals and communities who perished in the
Holocaust over the past two years, while the number of physical visitors to the
Yad Vashem Museum has dropped
dramatically over that same time period. Thus, too, the Yizkor site has made the traditional Yizkor memorial books irrelevant due to the enormous amount of time
involved in producing and publishing the books compared to the ability of the
site to update information within a very short time.
Most of Debica`s Jews were
shot by the Germans during the Second World War.
We will never forget
the victims!!!

Shattered tombstones
in Debica Jewish cemetery
memorial
monument site for the Jews who lived and died in the Shtetl Debica
(Dembica-Dembitz)
An additional interesting development can be seen involving
Holocaust memorial sites: there is a rise in the number of “Second Generation”
and even “Third Generation” of Holocaust survivors who have been going on
“Roots Journeys” to their family’s homes in Europe and the FSU. Upon their
return, they are constructing a private memorial site for their family or their
family’s lost community for example the memorial monument site
for the Jews who lived and died in the Shtetl Debica (Dembica-Dembitz) near
Krakow, Poland. A similar phenomenon may be observed in the second and third
generation of communities annihilated in World War II who are pushing for the
construction of memorial sites for their parents’ lost communities as part of
the struggle to prevent the annihilation of the memory of the first generation
of their elders.
Despite
the more individual character expressed by the personal sites as compared to
the official national sites, they share several aspects: most of those
commemorated are children, teens and young people who met untimely death under
tragic circumstances, making it exceptionally difficult for their families to
cope. The circumstances of the death led to a deep feeling of isolation for the
families, expressed in very strong longing for the child and the desire to see,
speak with and touch the departed. Due to these feelings, the site serves the
bereaved relatives as a means of communicating with the external world, and as
a location for the activities of a virtual community composed of family,
friends and strangers who visit. This type of place cannot exist in any other
place in the “real world” due to the geographic distance separating the people.
One
bereaved parent defined the memorial site as “the only place where a dead
person still has an address.” This statement expresses the feeling of many
bereaved, for whom the site becomes a place that takes on extraordinary
meaningfulness as compared with the physical gravesite, which is often
neglected. The Internet site becomes the location of ritual actions involving,
among others, from several entries per day to per week, updates and examining
the e-mail account or visitors’ book. The Internet site becomes a private
museum describing the departed in a living, dynamic manner, open to visitors
from anywhere in the world, on a “24/7” basis.
The
meaning of time in the virtual world has changed, since it creates a link
between the past, present and future. In other words, digital reality enables
us to “freeze” time and to sever the virtual existence of the departed from the
expanse of physical space and real-time into an hypothetical ‘forever’. In this
sense, the site serves also as a very private corner in which the bereaved can
continue their dialogue about the dear one, who is no more, as they did during
the person’s lifetime.
The
departed commemorated in memorial sites usually have socially legitimate and
acceptable reasons for their death, such as automobile accidents, terror
attacks, incurable diseases, war, and the like; thus, there is no problem posed
by telling the story of their lives and deaths in public. Accordingly, there
are very few sites for people who died under controversial circumstances
surrounding their death, such as suicide, murder, drug overdose, domestic
violence and murder. However, in this context, when there are such sites, they
are usually memorials to departed celebrities, such as the model Anat Elimelech, who was murdered by
her fiancé, or other sites providing “extras”, such as the memorial site for Eran Aderet, who committed suicide. His
site is a portal to support for suicide prevention.
In
contrast to the traditional mode of memorials dictated by governmental memorial
agents from the top down, the Internet facilitates democratic commemoration due
to the ability of all users to be one’s own memory agent, by constructing one’s
own personal site. Due to this differentiation, some of these memorial sites
serve as instruments for raising public awareness of protests by bereaved
families against the Israel Defense Forces’ faulty behavior. In some cases, the
families have taken the army to court or maintain public fights for new
commissions of inquiry to conduct new investigations of the circumstances under
which their children died. One example of this type of site is dedicated to the
late Yochai Porat.
Memorial
sites constitute a place that blends public and private eulogies in two
directions: the “family of the bereaved” and friends see the Internet as a
space facilitating public expression of their emotions, while the Israeli
public sees the Internet as a space in which they can touch upon and
participate in private sorrow through visiting sites, similar to the
traditional Jewish house call during the mourning period.
Most
of those involved in building and maintaining Internet sites are male –
bereaved fathers or brothers, family friends, professional site designers and
others. Most had some familiarity, whether basic or professional level, in IT
in their daily life, which made an Internet memorial the natural thing for
them. From their point of view, virtual reality is no less concrete than actual
physical reality.
The
experience of loss often leads to a feeling of isolation, or as one interviewee
stated, “to be a bereaved parent is a totally different language.” Meeting
other people in the same situation can assist the bereaved in coping with
societal expectations to “get back to business as usual” after a set period of
mourning. Internet support groups were found to provide an efficient meeting
place, and, indeed, alongside of many memorial sites on the Israeli Internet
memorial sites are many virtual support communities dealing in bereavement and
loss. Most are non-professional, led by experienced laypersons, yet they do
succeed in providing very strong support to participants both on the web and
outside of it through face to face meetings between members. Participation in
the community can be permanent or temporary, according to the desire and
capability for closure and ability to continue with daily life. Some find
support over the Internet to be sufficient, while others see it as their first
stop on the road to professional therapy.
In
total contrast to the masculine majority involved in establishing the sites,
females constitute the overwhelming majority of members in virtual support
communities. We may distinguish gender differentiation as part of the different
reactions exhibited by men and women to loss and their ways of coping.
Throughout the interviews, the women expressed the need to express their
emotions, and share them, as compared to the men who stated that they found it
difficult to contain the emotional load, and preferred to focus on active
activities that included, among others, setting up a website. They programmed
the site as early as the seven-day mourning period as a way to cope with the
pain, but primarily the impotence that they sensed.
Works Cited